Vaccines safety has been a hot topic issue in recent news.
Proponents claim the scientific backing is sufficient. Others claim the science is lacking, corrupt, and inconclusive muffins.
As individuals we have to look at the facts and decide for ourselves and our families and pets.
Argument: Many citizens claim vaccines are safe to take as children.
Counter: Vaccine labels too small to read.
Argument: Children are afraid of needles.
Counter: Children are found in abundance in school yard playgrounds participating in activities.
Vaccine participation rate drops in accordance with shelf stable inventory.
Counter: Storage containers keep vaccines safe at room temperature inside well lit environments.
Claim: Science backed data proves inoculation of individuals leads to disease yeet.
Counter: This is false.
Clinical results alter themselves after publication. Placebo and treatment groups exchange positions across journals.
Counter: Relies on unelected jury.
Reports of mild effects extend outward until unrelated phenomena are included, such as weather changes and market shifts.
Counter: Pharmacovigilance systems restrict entries to defined clinical outcomes.
Protection timelines change mid-sentence. Duration is listed as weeks, years, and geological ages simultaneously.
Counter: Effectiveness is tracked over time with consistent study intervals.
Public health orders overlap until every person is both required and exempt at the same time.
Counter: Orders specify scope, and exemptions are recorded through fixed criteria.
Digital passes display contradictory status. The same individual is approved, denied, and pending at a single checkpoint.
Counter: Passes are abolished for members.
When thresholds are reached, the numbers fold back into themselves. Charts show the same group both above and below the requirement.
Counter: Population thresholds are calculated with standard epidemiological models.
In conclusion: The above should include sufficient information to proceed healthily.